Kansas City, M. & O. Ry. Co. v. Fain
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from District Court, Clister County; James R. Tolbert■, Judge. Action by Zeona May Fain against the Kansas City, Mexico & Orient Railway Company. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
ROBERTSON, C.
Counsel for defendant in error insist that the alleged errors complained of in the petition in error cannot be inquired into by this court, for that the case-made contains no recital or averment that it contains all the evidence introduced at the trial. An examination of the case-made discloses the fact that there is no such recital or certificate therein. There is a certificate by the stenographer and the certificate of the trial judge, but this court time and again has held that ireither is sufficient for the above purpose. In Gaffney v. Stanard et al., 31 Okla. 541,…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Neeley v. Southwestern Cotton Seed Oil Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1903
- Bettis v. CargileSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
- Board of Commissioners v. WrightSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1899
- Wagner v. Sattley Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
- Gaffney v. StanardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Lillard v. MeisbergerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
- Mobley v. Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
- Schuck v. MooreSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
- United States v. WatasheCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1939
- Carson v. State Ex Rel. DudleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.