Legal Opinion

Richman v. Wallman

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided April 21, 2017No. AC38584PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

The self-represented plaintiff, Terri L. Richman, appeals from the judgment of the trial court ordering her to sign the revised qualified domestic relations orders (QDROs) 1 that were prepared to divide the retirement assets of her former husband, the defendant, Scott A. Wallman, between the two parties. 2 On appeal, the plaintiff claims that the court (1) improperly held her in contempt, and (2) improperly modified the distribution of the parties' property without the requisite subject matter jurisdiction to do so. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

The following facts and procedural…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Krafick v. KrafickSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
  2. Rubin v. RubinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
  3. Mickey v. MickeySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
  4. Schorsch v. SchorschConnecticut Appellate Court · 1999
  5. Fewtrell v. FewtrellConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Morton v. SyriacConnecticut Appellate Court · 2020
  2. Casablanca v. CasablancaConnecticut Appellate Court · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API