Legal Opinion

Fewtrell v. Fewtrell

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided February 15, 2005No. AC 24879PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

McLACHLAN, J.

This case arises out of a property division order rendered by the trial court incident to a marital dissolution action. The sole claim on appeal is that the defendant, Mary Ann Fewtrell, impermissibly moved for a modification of the court’s order after the entiy of the judgment of dissolution and that the court, therefore, lacked subject matter jurisdiction to entertain the pleading. We disagree that the pleading at issue constituted a motion for modification and, accordingly, conclude that the court had subject matter jurisdiction to consider and act on the motion.

*528The…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Bunche v. BuncheSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
  2. Clement v. ClementConnecticut Appellate Court · 1994
  3. Jaser v. JaserConnecticut Appellate Court · 1995
  4. Passamano v. PassamanoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
  5. In re Haley B.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2003

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Simes v. SimesConnecticut Appellate Court · 2006
  2. O'Halpin v. O'HalpinConnecticut Appellate Court · 2013
  3. Perugini v. DevinoConnecticut Appellate Court · 2008
  4. Richman v. WallmanConnecticut Appellate Court · 2017
  5. Bento v. BentoConnecticut Appellate Court · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API