Legal Opinion

Winn v. Wright

Court of Appeals of Tennessee

Decided November 14, 1944No. 1PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcAMIS, J.

This is an action for the recovery of real estate commissions, successfully defended below upon the ground that the broker was not licensed as required by Chapter 182, Acts of 1919, Code, Section 1712 et seq. The plaintiff has appealed and, admitting that he was not a licensed real estate broker, insists that he is entitled to recover under the single transaction rule recognized and followed in Trentham v. Moore, 111 Tenn. 346, 76 S. W. 904; Wender v. Lobertini, 151 Tenn. 476, 477, 267 S. W. 367; Walker v. Brownsville Cotton, etc., Co., 4 Tenn. App. 104.

For defendant it is insisted that the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Trentham v. MooreTennessee Supreme Court · 1903
  2. Davis v. HaileyTennessee Supreme Court · 1920
  3. Wender v. LobertiniTennessee Supreme Court · 1924
  4. Johnson v. BakerTennessee Supreme Court · 1923
  5. Cantrell v. PerkinsTennessee Supreme Court · 1941

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Thomas v. MillionCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1952
  2. Acuff v. BarnesTennessee Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Frierson v. EwingCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1949
  4. Brown v. Van PeltCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1953
  5. Holcomb v. SteeleCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API