Legal Opinion

Davis v. Hailey

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 1920PublishedCited by 17 opinions

FROM DAVIDSON. Appeal from the Chancery Court of Davidson County. —Hon. Jas. B. Newman, Chancellor.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Green

*249This suit attacks tlie constitutionality of chapter 182 of the Acts of 1919. Tlie case Avas heard on demurrer before the chancellor, and he sustained the demurrer and upheld the act. The complainant has appealed to this court.

The act is assailed on several grounds, the first of which is that it contains tAVo subjects in violation of section 17 of article 2 of the Constitution. The caption of the act is as follows:

“An act to regulate the licensing of real estate agents and real estate salesmen in the State- of Tennessee, and the Ararious counties thereof, and to define and punish offenses…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Bell v. HartTennessee Supreme Court · 1920
  2. McMillan v. City of KnoxvilleTennessee Supreme Court · 1917

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Dorrier v. DarkTennessee Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Chattanooga-Hamilton County Hospital Authority v. City of ChattanoogaTennessee Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Cosmopolitan Life Insurance Co. v. NorthingtonTennessee Supreme Court · 1957
  4. Johnson v. BakerTennessee Supreme Court · 1923
  5. Chumbley v. Peoples Bank & Trust Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1933

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API