Johnson v. Baker

Mr. Malone, Special Judge,

delivered the opinion of the Court.

This was a bill filed to collect a real estate agent’s commission.

The chancellor and the court of civil appeals concurred in holding the defendant liable for the commission, and we think their decree must be affirmed, unless the defendant can sustain his contention that the complainant was not a duly authorized agent, under the terms of chapter 182 of the Acts of 1919.

The material sections of this act, in so far as the present controversy is.concerned, are as follows:

“Section 1. Be it enacted by the general assembly of the State of…