Legal Opinion
Almacs, Inc. v. Hackett
District Court, D. Rhode Island
Decided May 11, 1970No. Civ. A. 4323PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PETTINE, District Judge.
This is a civil action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1331 in which the plaintiffs, five corporations doing business in Rhode Island, seek injunctive relief against the defendant, who is the Director of the Rhode Island Department of Employment Security. By consent of the parties, the union which represents the employees of the plaintiff corporations has been permitted to intervene. The plaintiffs have moved to convene a three-judge court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2281, and the defendant and intervening defendant have moved to dismiss, or in the alternative, to have the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Saint Paul Mercury Indemnity Co. v. Red Cab Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- San Diego Building Trades Council v. GarmonSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- United States v. United Mine Workers of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Swift & Co. v. WickhamSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Ex Parte BransfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Berberian v. New England Telephone & Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1977
- Feaster v. VanceDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2003
- MEMCO v. Maryland Employment Security AdministrationCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1977
- Dow Chemical Co. v. TaylorDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1972
- GRINNELL CORPORATION v. HackettDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 1972
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.