Legal Opinion

Paschal v. Commissioner of Social Security

District Court, N.D. California

Decided September 25, 2019No. 1:18-cv-01932Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 EUREKA DIVISION 7 8 KAJUAN PASCHAL, Case No. 18-cv-01932-RMI 9 Plaintiff, ORDER ON CROSS MOTIONS FOR 10 v. SUMMARY JUDGMENT 11 COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL Re: Dkt. Nos. 18, 23 SECURITY, 12 Defendant. 13 14 Plaintiff, Kajuan Paschal, received supplemental security income (“SSI”) disability 15 payments under Title XVI of the Social Security Act as a child; and, upon reevaluation of his 16 eligibility when he turned 18, a finding was entered that he was no longer disabled as of July 1, 17 2014. Plaintiff now seeks judicial…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Molina v. AstrueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
  2. Deborah L. Burch v. Jo Anne B. Barnhart, Commissioner of Social SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
  3. Lingenfelter v. AstrueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
  4. Jana M. Bayliss v. Jo Anne B. Barnhart, Commissioner, Social Security AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
  5. Reddick v. ChaterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API