Legal Opinion
In re O'Doherty
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided July 13, 1961PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Per curiam
This is a disciplinary proceeding instituted against an attorney and counselor at law, under section 90 of the Judiciary Law. Under original and supplemental petitions hearings were conducted by a Referee appointed by this court. With respect to the charges contained in the original petition the Referee found respondent guilty of “ technical ” conversions and with respect to the charges contained in the supplemental petition found that the proof did not establish misconduct.
The Referee’s report with respect to the original petition should be confirmed, except that the characterization of the…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Charges of Association of the Bar v. RandelNew York Court of Appeals · 1899
- In re NicoliniAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1941
- In re HahnAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1955
- In re BerksonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1953
- In re GetzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1939
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- In re LaCavaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
- In re FisherDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2012
- In re RochlinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984