In re Rochlin

OPINION OF THE COURT

Respondent Martin Rochlin was admitted to practice as an attorney and counselor at law in the First Judicial Department on December 12,1958. In a prior disciplinary proceeding, he was found guilty of conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit and misrepresentation in violation of DR 1-102 (A) (4) of the Code of Professional Responsibility. In imposing a censure, we noted that respondent had been hospitalized on two occasions for depression arising from that occurrence. (Matter of Rochlin, 93 AD2d 683.)

*264The Departmental Disciplinary Committee has now brought two additional…