Legal Opinion

In re Hahn

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 12, 1955PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

Respondent has frankly admitted two conversions of clients’ funds, and has been co-operative throughout this proceeding. Upon evidence of a series of prolonged and expensive operations and hospitalizations, accompanied and followed by long periods of intense pain, the Referee drew the following conclusions: “It was the severe mental and physical pressures on the respondent resulting from a loss of income due to illness, and the intense pain dulling his correct thinking which was the cause of the wrongdoing rather than moral turpitude. This conclusion is further supported by respondent’s…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. In re O'DohertyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1961
  2. In re BuchbinderAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1963
  3. In re StrahlAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1961
  4. In re SwitzerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1963
  5. In re TimonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API