Legal Opinion

O. C. Smith v. Humble Oil and Refining Company, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided May 22, 1970No. 28386PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

This is an appeal from an order of the district court dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint for lack of jurisdiction. We affirm.

The litigation before us had its genesis in a 1934 trespass to try title suit brought in a Texas state court. In that suit Humble Oil and Refining Company, defendant herein, sought to clear the title to certain land in East Texas on which it had an oil lease. That suit apparently resulted in a determination that Humble had a valid leasehold in the land and that title to the disputed property rested in parties other than the plaintiffs’ predecessors in title.

In 1965…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Kline v. Burke Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
  2. Princess Lida of Thurn and Taxis v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  3. Penn Central Casualty Co. v. Pennsylvania Ex Rel. SchnaderSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  4. Palmer v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
  5. Humble Oil & Refining Co. v. Sun Oil Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1951

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. African Methodist Episcopal v. Willard Lucien, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2014
  2. Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 97,533 Securities and Exchange Commission v. Walter Wencke Superior Motels, Inc. v. R. N. Gould and Securities and Exchange Commission, Receiver and Real Party in Interest AndCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
  3. 1st National Credit Corp. v. Von HakeDistrict Court, D. Utah · 1981
  4. Lowe v. LoftusDistrict Court, S.D. Georgia · 1970
  5. Securities & Exchange Commission v. WenckeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API