Legal Opinion

Watnick v. City of Detroit

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 16, 1962No. Docket 105, Calendar 48,583Published

1Opinion of the Court

365 Mich. 600 (1962)

113 N.W.2d 876

WATNICK

v.

CITY OF DETROIT.

Docket No. 105, Calendar No. 48,583.

Supreme Court of Michigan.

Decided March 16, 1962.

Seymour I. Caplan and George Stone, for plaintiffs.

Nathaniel H. Goldstick, Corporation Counsel, and Robert D. McClear, Assistant Corporation Counsel, for defendant.

CARR, J.

This case involves the validity of an ordinance of the city of Detroit adopted in July, 1957, and designated Ordinance No 219-F, chapter 455 of the ordinances of said city. The purpose of said ordinance was to proscribe the selling of jewelry on Sunday and the keeping open of places…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Lindsley v. Natural Carbonic Gas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
  2. Borden's Farm Products Co. v. BaldwinSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  3. Lawrence v. State Tax Comm'n of Miss.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
  4. Schmidt v. BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, CITY OF NEWARKSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1952
  5. Cady v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1939

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API