Legal Opinion
Steiger v. City of San Diego
California Court of Appeal
Decided August 22, 1958No. Civ. 5823PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
McCABE, J. pro tem. *
Since 1922 plaintiffs have been the owners of certain land in the Point Loma area of the city of San Diego. Their land holdings in this area were increased in 1945 to a total holding of approximately 13 acres. For longer than the history in the record recites there was a draw or swale which crosses diagonally over the property. From 1922 plaintiffs’ evidence indicates there was no running water in the draw except in 1927 and 1935, when there was a heavy rainfall. During these two rainfalls there was a small amount of water which ran through the property and which water…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Pennsylvania Coal Co. v. MahonSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Mugler v. KansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
- Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Archer v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Reardon v. City of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Frustuck v. City of FairfaxCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
- Salton Bay Marina, Inc. v. Imperial Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
- Alisal Sanitary District v. KennedyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
- City of Pleasant Hill v. First Baptist ChurchCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
- Sheffet v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.