Legal Opinion

State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Hamilton

District Court, D. South Carolina

Decided May 3, 1971No. Civ. A. 69-21PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

SIMONS, District Judge.

This interpleader action was commenced by plaintiff against the defendants pursuant to Rule 22 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure as a result of a three-car automobile collision that occurred on June 15, 1968 on U. S. Highway # 25 near Ware Shoals, South Carolina.

At the time of the collision plaintiff had in full force and effect its automobiie liability insurance policy # A0006 600 A23 40 insuring Defendant George M. Coleman with liability limits as follows: For bodily injury $10,000 for each person and $20,000 for each accident, and $5,-000 for property…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Tyger River Pine Co. v. Maryland Casualty Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1933
  2. Alford v. Textile Insurance CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1958
  3. Carroway v. JohnsonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1965
  4. Bennett v. ConradySupreme Court of Kansas · 1957
  5. Bartlett v. Travelers InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1933

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. United States Gypsum Co. v. Admiral InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1994
  2. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. CraigSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989
  3. Hartford Casualty Insurance v. DoddDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1976
  4. Scharnitzki v. BienenfeldSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  5. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API