Legal Opinion

Bennett v. Conrady

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 12, 1957No. 40,167PublishedCited by 50 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Robb, J.:

This is an appeal by three plaintiffs in a consolidated case from an order of the trial court directing an insurance carrier of the common defendant to pay a certain sum together with interest thereon into court to be distributed pro rata in satisfaction of judgments obtained by the plaintiffs. The parties will continue to be denominated as stated above.

Our attention is first directed by the insurance carrier to its contention that plaintiffs are not entitled to the relief they are seeking. While this was not pursued to any great length we do…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Best Building Co. v. Employers' Liability Assurance Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1928
  2. Anderson v. Southern Surety Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1920
  3. Getchell & Martin L. M. Co. v. Employers Liability Assurance Corp.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1902
  4. Saul v. Saint Paul-Mercury Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1952

3Cited by50 opinions

  1. Glenn v. FlemingSupreme Court of Kansas · 1990
  2. Texas Farmers Insurance Co. v. SorianoTexas Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Bollinger v. NussSupreme Court of Kansas · 1969
  4. Spencer v. Aetna Life & Casualty InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1980
  5. Alford v. Textile Insurance CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1958

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API