Legal Opinion

Sandusky v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided February 21, 1985No. Appeal, No. 1596 C.D. 1983PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge Rogers,

Donald Sandusky (claimant) has filed a petition for review of an order of the Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (board) affirming a referee’s decision denying him benefits for his alleged total disability on the ground that he failed to meet his burden to prove that the incidence of the condition of which *607he complained — aggravation of his genetic lnng disease — was greater in the welding industry than in the general population, as required by Section 108(n) of The Pennsylvania Workmen’s Compensation Act (Act), Act of June 2, 1915, P.L. 736, as amended, 77 P.S.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Plasteel Products Corp. v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  2. Pawlosky v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  3. Bovino v. Board of School DirectorsCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1977

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Long v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  2. Pittsburgh Board of Education v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  3. McCullough v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  4. Leed v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  5. Leed v. WCAB (QUAKER ALLOY CAST. CO.)Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1986

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API