Pawlosky v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Judge Williams, Jr.,
This is an appeal by claimant Prank Pawlosky from an order of the Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board which affirmed the referee’s denial of his claim for benefits under The Pennsylvania Workmen’s Compensation Act (Act).1
Pawlosky filed his petition on November 7, 1977, claiming a disability caused by an ‘ ‘occupational disease” as defined in Section 108 of the Act.2 He later amended his claim to assert entitlement under the general compensation provisions of the Act.3 The referee’s findings — which are not challenged here — reflect that Pawlosky was employed by…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Plasteel Products Corp. v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
- Findlay Refractories v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
- McHale v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
- Stanton v. Ben Rubin Ajax Cleaners-DyersCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
3Cited by19 opinions
- Pawlosky v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Hayden v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- Werner v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
- Long v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
- Brody v. MihmOhio Supreme Court · 1995
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.