McCullough v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Judge Craig,
Cynthia McCullough appeals an order of the Workmens Compensation Appeal Board affirming a referees dismissal of the claimants petition for compensation under section 108(n) of The Pennsylvania Workmens Compensation Act.1 The boards order is affirmed.
The referee found that the claimant worked as a technical representative for Xerox Corporation begin*623ning August 27, 1979. Her duties included cleaning, repairing and maintaining photocopy machines. According to the words of the referees finding, the claimant “missed” work from January 8, 1981 until December 6, 1981.
In March,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Katz v. Evening BulletinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
- Wilkinson v. United Parcel Service of Pennsylvania, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
- Hoffman v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
- Sandusky v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
3Cited by5 opinions
- City of Erie v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
- Cerasaro v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
- Mayo v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
- City of Erie v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
- McCULLOUGH ET VIR v. WCAB (XEROX C.)Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1986