Legal Opinion

McCullough v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 29, 1986No. Appeal, No. 3243 C.D. 1984PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge Craig,

Cynthia McCullough appeals an order of the Workmens Compensation Appeal Board affirming a referees dismissal of the claimants petition for compensation under section 108(n) of The Pennsylvania Workmens Compensation Act.1 The boards order is affirmed.

The referee found that the claimant worked as a technical representative for Xerox Corporation begin*623ning August 27, 1979. Her duties included cleaning, repairing and maintaining photocopy machines. According to the words of the referees finding, the claimant “missed” work from January 8, 1981 until December 6, 1981.

In March,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Katz v. Evening BulletinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  2. Wilkinson v. United Parcel Service of Pennsylvania, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
  3. Hoffman v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  4. Sandusky v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1985

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. City of Erie v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  2. Cerasaro v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  3. Mayo v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  4. City of Erie v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  5. McCULLOUGH ET VIR v. WCAB (XEROX C.)Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API