Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Thor Templin

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided March 29, 2016No. 2015AP000284-DPublished

1ConcurrenceShirley S. Abrahamson, J.

¶ 49. (concurring). I join the per curiam. I write separately, however, to discuss a procedural issue posed in the instant case relating to current OLR practice: How should the OLR address multiple investigations of a lawyer during substantially the same time period? Should the OLR propose disciplining an attorney in one disciplinary proceeding only to support a different discipline or suspension of the license in the near future in another proceeding?

¶ 50. To understand the procedural issue, I state key dates relating to OLR's case against Attorney Thor Templin.

¶ 51. OLR's complaint in the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Daniel W. Johns, Jr.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2014
  2. Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Tim OsickaWisconsin Supreme Court · 2014
  3. Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Kenneth R. KratzWisconsin Supreme Court · 2014
  4. Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Tim OsickaWisconsin Supreme Court · 2014
  5. Office of Lawyer Regulation v. David J. WinkelWisconsin Supreme Court · 2015

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API