Legal Opinion

STATE BY & THROUGH DEPT. OF TRANSP. v. Grudnik

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided September 7, 1976No. File 11795PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ANDERST, Circuit Judge.

This is an intermediate appeal from an order of the circuit court. It involves an interpretation of the South Dakota Rules of Civil Procedure concerning the taking of a pretrial discovery-deposition of the opponent’s expert witness and requiring him to produce designated books, papers, documents, or tangible things which are in his possession, custody or control.

Plaintiff, State of South Dakota, brought a condemnation proceeding for the acquisition of land and temporary easements needed for the reconstruction of a bridge and abutting highway over Rapid Creek in Rapid…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. State Highway Commission v. EarlSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Rapid City v. BaronSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Alger v. American Family Mutual InsuranceSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1969

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Kaarup v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Phipps Bros. Inc. v. Nelson's Oil & Gas, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Phipps Bros. Inc. v. Nelson's Oil & Gas, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
  4. State Ex Rel. Missouri Highway & Transportation Commission v. AndersonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1987
  5. State Ex Rel. Missouri Highway & Transportation Commission v. AndersonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API