Legal Opinion
Kaarup v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Co.
South Dakota Supreme Court
Decided February 8, 1989No. 15948PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
AMUNDSON, Circuit Judge.
This appeal stems from an intermediate order that denied Carol and Darrell Kaar-up’s motion to compel discovery. We affirm in part, reverse in part and remand.
In 1979 Carol Kaarup purchased a home that she and her husband Darrell occupied at all material times. On July 24, 1980, First Federal Savings and Loan Association of Canton (First Federal) loaned Kaarups $50,000. Both Carol and Darrell signed the promissory note, and the note was secured by a mortgage on the home. Prior to making the loan, First Federal consulted with an attorney regarding the validity of taking…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- United States v. NoblesSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- In Re MurphyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1977
- Handgards, Inc. v. Johnson & JohnsonDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1976
- The Duplan Corporation v. Moulinage Et Retorderie De Chavanoz, Deering Milliken, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1975
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- National Tank Co. v. BrothertonTexas Supreme Court · 1993
- Dakota, Minnesota & Eastern Railroad v. AcuitySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
- State v. BuchholzSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
- Bertelsen v. Allstate Insurance Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
- Maynard v. HeerenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.