Legal Opinion · Dissent

State Ex Rel. Missouri Highway & Transportation Commission v. Anderson

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided July 14, 1987No. 68446Published

1DissentRendlen, Judge

For the reasons here discussed, I respectfully dissent.

In this action for mandamus and prohibition originally brought in the Court of Appeals, Southern District, that Court issued its preliminary rule in prohibition and alternative writ of mandamus and on final determination quashed the writs. We consider the case as an original proceeding.

In the underlying cause the Missouri Highway and Transportation Commission *359seeks to condemn the private lands of two owners for use in a highway project utilizing federal funds. Drawing upon the well reasoned opinion of Titus, P.J., by which the Southern…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Barker v. DunhamTexas Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Shelby County R-IV School District v. HermanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1965
  3. Crist v. Iowa State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of Iowa · 1963
  4. St. Louis Little Rock Hospital, Inc. v. GaertnerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1984
  5. Shell v. State Road DepartmentSupreme Court of Florida · 1961

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API