Legal Opinion

McCullough v. Moore

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided January 14, 1904No. Gen. No. 11,045PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Debt upon bond. Error to the Superior Court of Cook County; the Hon. Philip Stein, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the March term, 1903.

1Opinion of the Court

Mb. Presiding J ostice Adams

delivered the opinion of the court.

The condition of the bond sued on being to comply with the conditions of the lease from McCullough to Stebbins, as to the erection of buildings on a portion of the demised premises, the conditions of the lease, as to the erection of buildings, are as much a part of the condition of the bond as if set forth at large therein. Therefore, the condition of the bond must be read as follows: The condition of the above obligation is such that if the said Landt and Moore, or their assigns,'shall erect and complete upon said premises, by or…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Scofield v. TompkinsIllinois Supreme Court · 1880
  2. City of Chicago v. People ex rel. NortonIllinois Supreme Court · 1870
  3. Hennessy v. MetzgerIllinois Supreme Court · 1894
  4. Gobble v. LinderIllinois Supreme Court · 1875
  5. Nobles v. BatesNew York Supreme Court · 1827

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Giesecke v. CullertonIllinois Supreme Court · 1917
  2. Burnett v. NolenAppellate Court of Illinois · 1949
  3. Pierce v. B & C ELECTRIC, INC.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1982
  4. Berger v. NantsAppellate Court of Illinois · 1912
  5. Landt v. McCulloughAppellate Court of Illinois · 1906

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API