Legal Opinion
Burnett v. Nolen
Appellate Court of Illinois
Decided January 26, 1949No. Term No. 4806PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Scheineman
The defendant appeals from a judgment for $500 entered against him in favor of plaintiff, a Buick dealer, in a suit upon the following contract:
“This agreement entered into between Eugene Nolen and Hal Burnett, this 29th day of August, 1947, for One Dollar and other valuable consideration, said Nolen agrees to take delivery of 1947 Buick 40 Sedan-nett and further agrees to pay said Hal Burnett the sum of $500.00 in case he sells said automobile within 90 days from date, Hal Burnett agrees to bny this automobile back from Nolen for the amount paid by Nolen within 80 days from this date.”
The…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Weiss v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1921
- Giesecke v. CullertonIllinois Supreme Court · 1917
- Fosburgh v. California & Hawaiian Sugar Refining Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1923
- People ex rel. Rudaitis v. GalskisAppellate Court of Illinois · 1924
- Lu-Mi-Nus Signs, Inc. v. Jefferson Shoe Stores, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1930
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Kansas Quality Construction, Inc. v. ChiassonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1969
- Pick Fisheries, Inc. v. Burns Electronic Security Services, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1976
- Stanford Motor Co. v. WestmanNebraska Supreme Court · 1949
- Donow v. Board of TrusteesAppellate Court of Illinois · 1974
- Elizabethtown Lincoln Mercury, Inc. v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1950
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.