Legal Opinion

Berger v. Nants

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided October 3, 1912No. Gen. No. 17,011PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. John H. Hume, Judge, presiding. Heard in the Branch Appellate Court at the October term, 1910.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Fitch

Appellant brought suit in the Municipal Court against appellees, who are residents of Paris, Tennessee, claiming $7,500 for breach of contract, and served as garnishee the Peter Fox Sons Company, a copartnership, in Chicago. The trial court overruled a demurrer filed by the plaintiff to certain amended pleas to the amended declaration, and the plaintiff electing to stand by his demurrer, a judgment was entered in favor of the defendants, from which the plaintiff appeals.

Though several errors are assigned upon the record, only one is discussed in the briefs of counsel, as to the alleged error…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Scofield v. TompkinsIllinois Supreme Court · 1880
  2. Gobble v. LinderIllinois Supreme Court · 1875
  3. Poppers v. MeagherIllinois Supreme Court · 1893
  4. Pinkney v. WeaverIllinois Supreme Court · 1905
  5. Burk v. DunnAppellate Court of Illinois · 1894

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Burnett v. NolenAppellate Court of Illinois · 1949
  2. Lippman v. GraberAppellate Court of Illinois · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API