State of Arizona v. Darren Irving Goldin
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HOWARD, Presiding Judge:
¶ 1 In this petition for review, Darren Goldin challenges the trial court’s order denying his petition for post-conviction relief pursuant to Rule 32, Ariz. R. Crim. P., after an evidentiary hearing, and finding his claim of ineffective assistance of counsel (IAC) precluded. Based on our supreme court’s decision in State v. Diaz, 236 Ariz. 361, 340 P.3d 1069 (2014), and the unique circumstances of this ease, we grant relief in part, remanding this matter to the trial court to detei’mine whether Goldin is entitled to relief pursuant to Rule 32.1(f) and, if so, to…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Griffith v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Desist v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- James B. Beam Distilling Co. v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- American Trucking Assns., Inc. v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Bearup v. ShinnDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2024
- John Fitzgerald v. Hon. myers/state Ex Rel BrnovichArizona Supreme Court · 2017
- State of Arizona v. Michael Eugene TraversoArizona Supreme Court · 2025