Legal Opinion

Joseph R. Giannini v. Manuel L. Real A. Wallace Tashima

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided August 16, 1990No. 89-55466PublishedCited by 59 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HUG, Circuit Judge:

This case presents two issues: (1) whether the California Bar Examination and its grading process are constitutional; and (2) whether the Local Rules of the United States District Courts for the Central, Southern and Eastern Districts of California, which require attorneys seeking admission to those courts to be members in good standing of the California State Bar, are constitutional. The district court held both the bar examination and the local rules to be constitutional. We affirm.

I. Procedural Background

Joseph R. Giannini, a California resident, is an attorney who…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Kremer v. Chemical Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Schware v. Board of Bar Examiners of NMSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  3. Leis v. FlyntSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. White v. Massachusetts Council of Construction Employers, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. Supreme Court of NH v. PiperSupreme Court of the United States · 1985

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by59 opinions

  1. Commission for Lawyer Discipline v. BentonTexas Supreme Court · 1998
  2. William Gerber v. Rodney Hickman, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
  3. David J. Gallo, Movant-Appellant v. United States District Court for the District of Arizona, Real Party in Interest-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
  4. In Re Rose VCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
  5. A. Wallace Tashima, United States District Judge v. Administrative Office of the United States Courts L. Ralph Mecham, DirectorCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992

54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API