Legal Opinion

Maryland Cas. Co. v. Tiffin

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided December 2, 1988No. 87-979PublishedCited by 57 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The issue presented for review is whether Maryland Casualty Company is entitled to full and complete reimbursement of benefits previously paid and to a release of future liability of sums to be paid under Code 1975, § 25-5-60 ("Workmen's Compensation — Compensation for Death"), when the deceased employee's widow and minor children recover damages from third parties under Code 1975, § 25-5-11(a), substantially in excess of the amount of Maryland Casualty's liability under § 25-5-60.

The attorney for the widow and minor children had a contingency fee contract of one-third of all sums recovered…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Smith v. Equifax Services, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1988
  2. Tucker v. NicholsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1983
  3. Eagerton v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1983
  4. Airheart v. GreenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1958
  5. Tatum v. Schering Corp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1988

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by57 opinions

  1. Tapscott v. MS Dealer Service Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1996
  2. Green Oil Co. v. HornsbySupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  3. Henderson by Hartsfield v. Alabama PowerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1993
  4. Powell v. Blue Cross and Blue ShieldSupreme Court of Alabama · 1990
  5. INDUSTRIAL CHEMICAL AND FIBERGLASS CORP. v. ChandlerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989

52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API