Legal Opinion

Jackson v. Mannesmann Demag Corp.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided July 8, 1983No. 81-694, 81-695PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Jerome Jackson was injured by an electric arc furnace at the Autlan Manganese Corporation plant near Theodore, Alabama. His claims against the appellees, McDowell-Wellman Engineering Corporation and Mannesmann Demag Corporation, were based on the Alabama Extended Manufacturer's Liability Doctrine and on negligence. The trial court granted a summary judgment in favor of the defendants, based on Alabama's statute of repose regarding improvements to real estate, § 6-5-218, Code of Alabama 1975, which reads as follows:

"(a) No action in tort, contract or otherwise shall be commenced against any…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Overland Const. Co., Inc. v. SirmonsSupreme Court of Florida · 1979
  2. Tucker v. NicholsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1983
  3. Pickett v. MatthewsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1939
  4. Lankford v. Sullivan, Long & HagertySupreme Court of Alabama · 1982
  5. Bagby Elevator and Electric Company, Inc. v. McBrideSupreme Court of Alabama · 1974

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Kenyon v. HammerArizona Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Zapata v. BurnsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
  3. Daugaard v. Baltic Cooperative Building Supply Ass'nSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Blaske v. Smith & Entzeroth, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1991
  5. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Co. v. Getty Oil Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API