Legal Opinion

Avan v. Municipal Court

California Supreme Court

Decided April 28, 1965No. L.A. 28242PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcCOMB, J.

Petitioner is an attorney at law and is the duly appointed Public Defender of the City of Los Angeles.

He seeks a writ of mandate commanding respondent court to comply with the requirements of section 987a of the Penal Code by determining, and awarding to him, a reasonable sum for compensation and for necessary expenses due him on account of his representing in respondent court, as court-appointed counsel, a person charged therein with a misdemeanor offense and determined by the court to be unable to employ an attorney.

This proceeding seeks an interpretation of section 987a of the Penal Code,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Phelan v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  2. Prichard v. KimballCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Allan v. Guaranty Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1917

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Ligda v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
  2. In Interest of DunmireIdaho Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Halpin v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
  4. Polakovic v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
  5. Marks v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API