Legal Opinion

Halpin v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 11, 1966No. Civ. 11285PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRegan, J.

Petitioners seek a writ of mandate to compel the respondent court to set reasonable attorneys’ fees for services rendered as court-appointed attorneys in accordance with 987a of the Penal Code. 1

Shasta County has no public defender. Pursuant to their appointment by the respondent court, petitioners did, in September 1965, appear on behalf of and defend one John Ray Hoehstedler who was charged with murder. Petitioners are experienced attorneys and prominent members of the Shasta-Trinity Counties Bar Association. The trial by jury, which resulted in an acquittal of the defendant, required six…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Bank of Italy v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
  2. Hill v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  3. Avan v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Phillips v. SeelyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
  2. Pedlow v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
  3. Caldo Oil Co. v. State Water Resources Control BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
  4. Polakovic v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
  5. Pedlow v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API