Legal Opinion
Marks v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal
Decided October 21, 1966No. Civ. 30662PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CHANTRY, J. pro tem. *
This is a petition for writ of review, which we shall treat as a proceeding in mandate.
Pacts : Petitioner, Burton Marks, is an attorney at law. On or about December 24, 1965, he was appointed by respondent court (Appellate Department of the Superior Court, County of Los Angeles, State of California) 1 as attorney for Henry A. Mangaser, an indigent, with respect to Mangaser’s appeal to the appellate department of the superior court from a conviction 2 in the municipal court. Although the appointive order stated the appointment was “without compensation,” petitioner…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- People v. GarnettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
- Rowe v. Yuba CountyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
- Boehmer v. Big Rock Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- Hill v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
- Lamont v. Solano Cty.California Supreme Court · 1874
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Luke v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
- People v. CastilloCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
- Polakovic v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
- Davis v. Superior CourtCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1976