Legal Opinion

Bowlin v. Freeland

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided December 9, 1926No. 3312PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWillson, C. J.

(after stating the facts as above). Appellee’s claim of title to the land in controversy was on the theory that it belonged to J. K. Freeland; that said Freeland died intestate; and that they and appellant were his only heirs and as such took the title. But appellees failed .to prove that the title was ever in said Freeland. Hence they were not entitled to the judgment they obtained, unless they proved that said Freeland was the source of appellant’s claim of title, as well as of their own. They relied for proof of that on what appeared on the deed records of Panola county to be an instrument…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. May v. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1919
  2. Holloway v. McIlhenny Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Hill v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1926
  4. McDade v. VogelCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1914
  5. Watt v. Parlin & Orendorff Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1906

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Bryan v. BryanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1953
  2. Starkey v. McNayCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1937
  3. Jeffus v. MullinsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1935
  4. Partin v. HoldenCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API