Legal Opinion

Hill v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided March 24, 1926No. 9896PublishedCited by 9 opinions

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

HAWKINS, Judge.

The information alleged that appellant “wilfully and maliciously” threw a stone, a piece of brick, and a piece of plank against and at a storehouse occupied by C. A. Swindell,” etc. (Art 1339, P. C. 1925 Revision). Appellant was convicted and fined five dollars.

The evidence disclosed that the house was occupied by C. 0. Swindell, and there was no such person as C. A. Swindell. The point is made that this constituted a variance. “A middle initial is not known in law and a variance between the allegation and proof as to a middle initial is immaterial. A middle initial may be…

2Cited by9 opinions

  1. Martin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1976
  2. Bowlin v. FreelandCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1926
  3. Johnson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1939
  4. Jeffus v. MullinsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1935
  5. Burke v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1961

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API