Legal Opinion

Jeffus v. Mullins

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided February 13, 1935No. 9519PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BICKETT, Chief Justice.

This appeal by George Jeffus and G. M. Albertson from a judgment rendered in favor of Linnie E. Mullins, a feme sole, in an action brought by her upon a supersedeas bond executed by them in a former cause, presents a controlling issue as to election of remedies.

The bringing of this action followed a final judgment on appeal in a suit instituted by Linnie E. Mullins against C. A. Tanberg and wife, Thea J. Tanberg. In that case, the plaintiff recovered judgment in the district court against both of the defendants for the amount of a promissory note executed by them, and…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Trent v. RhombergTexas Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Blair v. SanbornTexas Supreme Court · 1892
  3. McKay v. SpeakTexas Supreme Court · 1852
  4. Burck v. BurroughsTexas Supreme Court · 1885
  5. Gould v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1923

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. WattsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1946
  2. Harrison v. BarngroverCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1938
  3. Mullins v. AlbertsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API