Legal Opinion
Clark v. VIP PetCare, LLC
District Court, N.D. California
Decided December 6, 2023No. 3:22-cv-08935Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 JULIE KAY CLARK, Case No. 22-cv-08935-AMO 8 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO 9 v. TRANSFER 10 VIP PETCARE, LLC, Re: Dkt. No. 42 Defendant. 11 12 13 Before the Court is Defendant VIP Petcare, LLC’s motion to transfer. The matter is fully 14 briefed and suitable for decision without oral argument. See Civil L.R. 7-6. Having read the 15 parties’ papers and carefully considered their arguments and the relevant legal authority, the Court 16 hereby GRANTS the motion for the following reasons.1 17 I. BACKGROUND 18…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Atlantic Marine Constr. Co. v. United States Dist. Court for Western Dist. of Tex.Supreme Court of the United States · 2013
- Jones v. GNC Franchising, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Decker Coal Company v. Commonwealth Edison CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. Jack W. SavageCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
- Lou v. BelzbergCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.