Reed v. Kellerman
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
KALODNER, District Judge.
The defendant has filed a motion for a new trial and a motion to take additional testimony on after discovered evidence, under Rule 59 of the Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c.
This case was tried before me without a jury. I filed my opinion and finding for the plaintiff on July 30, 1941. 40 F.Supp. 46.
Defendant filed with the clerk of the court a motion for a new trial on August 8, 1941, assigning the following reasons:
“1. The Findings and verdict was against the evidence.
“2. The Findings and verdict was against the weight of the evidence.
“3.…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Reed v. KellermanDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1941
3Cited by4 opinions
- Yourga v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1961
- Eastern Air Lines, Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1953
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Glass Marine Industries, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1962
- Raudenbush v. Baltimore & O. R. R.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1946