Legal Opinion

Reed v. Kellerman

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided December 31, 1941No. 396PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KALODNER, District Judge.

The defendant has filed a motion for a new trial and a motion to take additional testimony on after discovered evidence, under Rule 59 of the Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c.

This case was tried before me without a jury. I filed my opinion and finding for the plaintiff on July 30, 1941. 40 F.Supp. 46.

Defendant filed with the clerk of the court a motion for a new trial on August 8, 1941, assigning the following reasons:

“1. The Findings and verdict was against the evidence.
“2. The Findings and verdict was against the weight of the evidence.
“3.…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Reed v. KellermanDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1941

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Yourga v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1961
  2. Eastern Air Lines, Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1953
  3. Securities & Exchange Commission v. Glass Marine Industries, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1962
  4. Raudenbush v. Baltimore & O. R. R.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1946

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API