Legal Opinion

Bubar v. Bernardo

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided July 21, 1942PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMurchie, J.

The plaintiff brings this case to the Court on an exception to the ruling of the justice presiding in the Trial Court in ordering a nonsuit.

On the record it would have been necessary, had the issue been submitted to a jury, for findings to have been made that the plaintiff, as an employee of defendant, on September 8, 1938, while operating a jack hammer in defendant’s quarry, where six or more persons were regularly employed, suffered an eye injury from a chip of steel or iron which flew either from a hand hammer which he was wielding to remove a bit from the rod of the jack hammer or from…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Johnson v. New York, New Haven & Hartford RailroadSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1913
  2. Dempsey v. SawyerSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1901
  3. Smith v. LawrenceSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1903
  4. McTaggart v. Maine Central RailroadSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1905
  5. Nadeau v. Caribou Water, Light & Power Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1919

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Bartley v. CoutureSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1947
  2. Scribner v. CyrSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1952
  3. Berry v. AdamsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1950
  4. Lyle v. Bangor & Aroostook Railroad Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1954
  5. Temple v. Congress Square Garage, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1950

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API