Bubar v. Bernardo
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
1Opinion of the CourtMurchie, J.
The plaintiff brings this case to the Court on an exception to the ruling of the justice presiding in the Trial Court in ordering a nonsuit.
On the record it would have been necessary, had the issue been submitted to a jury, for findings to have been made that the plaintiff, as an employee of defendant, on September 8, 1938, while operating a jack hammer in defendant’s quarry, where six or more persons were regularly employed, suffered an eye injury from a chip of steel or iron which flew either from a hand hammer which he was wielding to remove a bit from the rod of the jack hammer or from…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Johnson v. New York, New Haven & Hartford RailroadSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1913
- Dempsey v. SawyerSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1901
- Smith v. LawrenceSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1903
- McTaggart v. Maine Central RailroadSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1905
- Nadeau v. Caribou Water, Light & Power Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1919
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Bartley v. CoutureSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1947
- Scribner v. CyrSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1952
- Berry v. AdamsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1950
- Lyle v. Bangor & Aroostook Railroad Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1954
- Temple v. Congress Square Garage, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1950
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.