Lyle v. Bangor & Aroostook Railroad Co.
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
1Opinion of the CourtWebber, J.
This matter comes before the Law Court on plaintiff’s exception to an order of non-suit. Plaintiff was employed as a section hand and track man on defendant’s railroad. It is properly alleged and not in dispute that defendant is a non-assenting employer of more than five workmen and that by the terms of the Workmen’s Compensation Act, R. S., 1944, Chap. 26, Sec. 3, the common law defenses,
“I. That the employee was negligent;
II; That the injury was caused by the negligence of a fellow employee;
III. That the employee has assumed the risk of the injury,”
are not available to this defendant. The…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Jordan v. Portland Coach Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1954
- Hunter v. TotmanSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1951
- Finn v. New England Telephone & Telegraph Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1906
- Bubar v. BernardoSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1942
- Loring v. Maine Central RailroadSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1930
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Hersum v. Kennebec Water DistrictSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1955
- Wilmer L. Lyle v. Bangor & Aroostook Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1956
- Wilmer L. Lyle v. Bangor & Aroostook Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1956
- Wilmer L. Lyle v. Bangor & Aroostook Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1956