Scribner v. Cyr
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
1Opinion of the CourtMerrill, J.
On motion. Action on a promissory note. The defendant pleaded material alteration of the note after delivery. The note was typewritten. Upon examination of the note it is apparent that the words with interest had been inserted between the second and third lines near the left-hand margin thereof, and that they have been erased.
The plaintiff introduced the note and rested. The defendant testified that when he executed the note the words with interest did not appear therein. He further testified that about ten days prior to the day the first installment of the note was to become due, he received…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Union Bank v. StoneSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1862
- York v. MathisSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1907
- Devine v. TierneySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1942
- Bubar v. BernardoSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1942
- Waterman v. VoseSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1857
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Murphy v. McCloudDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1994
- Twin Island Development Corp. v. WinchesterSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1986
- Palmer v. NissenDistrict Court, D. Maine · 1966
- Perry v. CurtisSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1953
- Ellsworth Marine, Inc. v. DavisSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1984
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.