Dempsey v. Sawyer
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
On motion by defendant. Case for personal injuries. Verdict for plaintiff for $950. The facts appear in tbe opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtEmery, J.
After studying the evidence, with the valuable aid of the full analysis made by the counsel, our conclusion is that we cannot hold the jury to have been unmistakably wrong in believing, and basing their verdict upon, the plaintiff’s version of the events, and in drawing inferences therefrom favorable to the plaintiff. The counsel for the defendant has argued strenuously upon the facts and inferences, but the verdict of the jury outweighs even his weighty argument. The version thus sustained is substantially as follows: The plaintiff was thirty years old, and was accustomed to the work of…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Hough v. Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1880
- Fitzgerald v. Connecticut River Paper Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1891
- Mahoney v. DoreMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1892
- Roux v. Blodgett & Davis Lumber Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1891
3Cited by13 opinions
- Rase v. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1909
- El Paso Southwestern Ry. Co. v. W.D. FothTexas Supreme Court · 1907
- El Paso & Southwestern Railroad v. FothCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1907
- Cincinnati, New Orleans & Texas Pacific Railway Co. v. GoldstonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1913
- Miller v. White Bronze Monument Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1908
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.