Legal Opinion
May v. Buck
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided July 11, 2012No. 05-09-01501-CVPublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Opinion By
Justice MOSELEY.
In a single-issue bench trial, the trial court determined that the property description contained in a letter agreement between appellant Randall Clayton May and appellee William “Bill” Buck did not satisfy the requirements of the statute of frauds. We affirm the trial court’s judgment.
BACKGROUND
On January 20, 2005, May, Buck, and appellee Petrox Energy Corporation (Pe-trox) entered into a letter agreement regarding the acquisition of mineral rights in Leon County, Texas. The letter agreement recited that May and Buck desired “to enter into an agreement to…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Downer v. Aquamarine Operators, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1985
- Cain v. BainTexas Supreme Court · 1986
- Coker v. CokerTexas Supreme Court · 1983
- J.M. Davidson, Inc. v. WebsterTexas Supreme Court · 2003
- Catalina v. BlasdelTexas Supreme Court · 1994
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Michael D. Karns v. Jalapeno Tree Holdings, LLC Mark S. Parmerlee And Paul Bambrey, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)2015
- Richard Nugent and CAO, Inc. v. the Estate of Janie Baker Ellickson, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2018
- Highland Credit Opportunities CDO, L.P. v. Ubs Ag, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2014
- Duane K. Rossmann v. Bishop Colorado Retail Plaza, L.P., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2015
- Anderson Energy Corp. v. Dominion Oklahoma Texas Exploration & Production, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2015
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.