Legal Opinion
Strumph v. Schering Corp.
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided May 21, 1992PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
256 N.J. Super. 309 (1992)
606 A.2d 1140
NANCY STRUMPH, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
v.
SCHERING CORPORATION, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
May 21, 1992.
Before Judges PRESSLER, SKILLMAN and D'ANNUNZIO.
Jack E. Milkis attorney for appellant (Earl G. Kauffman, admitted pro hac vice; Jack E. Milkis, on the brief).
Dughi and Hewit, attorneys for respondent (Russell L. Hewit and Mary Elizabeth Gazi, on the brief).
The opinion of the court was delivered by D'ANNUNZIO, J.A.D.
This is a product liability action against Schering Corporation, the manufacturer of a drug marketed…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Bose Corp. v. Consumers Union of United States, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Judson v. Peoples Bank & Trust Co. of WestfieldSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1954
- Rappaport v. NicholsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1959
- Dyer v. MacDougallCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1952
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Hammock Ex Rel. Hammock v. Hoffmann-LaRoche, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1995
- prod.liab.rep. (Cch) P 13,309 Milissa Garside v. Osco Drug, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1992
- Williamson v. WaldmanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1997
- Motus v. Pfizer Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2001
- McDarby v. Merck & Co., Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2008
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.