Legal Opinion

Roan Eagle v. State

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided April 25, 1991No. 90-459PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShanahan, J.

The State of Nebraska appeals from an award on rehearing by the Nebraska Workers’ Compensation Court in favor of James Roan Eagle. We affirm.

STANDARD OF REVIEW

“Findings of fact made by the Nebraska Workers’ Compensation Court after rehearing have the same force and effect as a jury verdict in a civil case. [Citations omitted.] In testing the sufficiency of evidence to support findings of fact made by the Nebraska Workers’ Compensation Court after rehearing, the evidence must be considered in the light most favorable to the successful party. [Citations omitted.] Factual determinations by the…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Rahmig v. Mosley MacHinery Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Heiliger v. Walters & Heiliger Electric, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Mendoza v. Omaha Meat ProcessorsNebraska Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Georgetowne Ltd. Partnership v. Geotechnical Services, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1988
  5. League v. VaniceNebraska Supreme Court · 1985

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Aken v. Nebraska Methodist HospitalNebraska Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Pearson v. Lincoln Telephone Co.Nebraska Court of Appeals · 1994
  3. Cox v. Fagen Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Foreman v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Miller v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1992

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API