Legal Opinion
Chaney v. Lackey
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided April 24, 1951No. 33899PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDavison, J.
This is an action brought by Woodward H. Lackey and Louise Lackey, his wife, to recover from their landlord, B. F. Chaney, penalties, as prescribed by the National Emergency Rent Contral Act (50 U. S. C. A., Appendix, §1881 et seq.), because of overcharge of rental for a furnished apartment and garage in the city of Tulsa, Oklahoma. The parties will be referred to as they appeared in the trial court.
From the early part of October, 1947, to the early part of January, 1948, plaintiffs occupied a furnished apartment and garage, owned by defendant. This was done following the execution of the…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Alva Roller Mills v. SimmonsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
- Brison v. McKellopSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
- Pure Oil Co. v. ChisholmSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
- Meek v. DaughertySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
- Small v. SchultzCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1949
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Globe & Rutgers Fire Ins. Co. v. RoysdenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1953
- Iven v. RoderSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1967
- Huff v. DuncanCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1974
- Ross v. Otis Elevator CompanySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1975