Legal Opinion

Small v. Schultz

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided March 21, 1949No. Nos. 9679, 9689PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MAJOR, Chief Judge.

This is an action by plaintiff, a tenant, against defendant, a landlord, for the recovery of damages pursuant to Section 205 of the Housing and Rent Act of 1947, effective June 30, 1947, Title 50 U.S.C.A.Appendix, § 1895, and Regulation Section 8 (a and b), promulgated thereunder by the Housing Expediter.

The complaint consists of two counts. The first count alleges that the rent demanded and received exceeded the maximum legal rent established therefor in the amount of $10.00 per month for three months. The second count alleges that the defendant as a condition of renting…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Bowles v. KrodelCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1945
  2. Turner Glass Corporation v. Hartford-Empire Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1949
  3. Leibman v. SiegelCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1949
  4. Fleming v. GordonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1947

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. United States v. NataleDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1950
  2. Burton v. KatzmanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1951
  3. Chaney v. LackeySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1951
  4. Meyercheck v. GivensCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1950
  5. United States v. BeattyDistrict Court, S.D. Iowa · 1950

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API