Legal Opinion

Cal Dive International, Inc. v. M/V Tzimin

District Court, S.D. Alabama

Decided August 18, 1989No. 85-1382-B-CPublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOHN R. BROWN, Circuit Judge.*

On the very eve of the commencement of a month’s long trial before this visiting judge, the magistrate entered a sanctions order against the intervening plaintiffs Stena AB and Rederi AB Concordia (collectively referred to as Stena). Stena timely appealed that decision.

Subjected to extreme abbreviation, this maritime suit by Cal Dive1 sought under the laws of Mexico, the United States of America, or both, a maritime lien against the M/V STENA SEAHORSE, in rem and in personam with intervention by Stena to enforce mortgages on the M/V STENA SEAHORSE. The asserted…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Larry Bonner v. City of Prichard, AlabamaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1981
  2. Mattie Norman, Clara Marshall, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated v. The Housing Authority of the City of MontgomeryCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1988
  3. Patricia Thomas v. Capital Security Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1988
  4. Roy E. Merritt, Cross-Appellants v. The International Brotherhood of Boilermakers, Dixon L. Pyles and C. R. McRae Cross-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
  5. In the Matter of the Complaint of the United States of America, as Owner of the United States Naval Ship Pvt. Joseph F. Merrell, for Exoneration From or Limitation of Liability v. Sumitomo Marine & Fire Insurance Company, Ltd., Etc., Defendants- in the Matter of the Complaint of the United States of America, as Owner of the United States Naval Ship Pvt. Joseph F. Merrell, for Exoneration From or Limitation of Liability, United States of America v. United States Naval Ship Pvt. Joseph F. Merrell and the Vessel "Pearl Venture", United States of America, Counter/claimant-Appellant v. The M/v Pearl Venture, Her Engines, Tackle, Etc., in Rem and Pearl Carriers, Inc., Defendants/counterclaim Sumitomo Marine & Fire Insurance Co., Ltd., a Corp., Plaintiffs v. Pearl Carriers, Inc., and the Vessel Pearl Venture, United States of America v. Sumitomo Marine & Fire Insurance Company, Claimant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. In re Independent Service Organizations Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1996
  2. Wagner v. Dryvit Systems, Inc.District Court, D. Nebraska · 2001
  3. Brown v. IowaDistrict Court, S.D. Iowa · 1993
  4. Jochims v. Isuzu Motors, Ltd.District Court, S.D. Iowa · 1992
  5. Foxley Cattle Co. v. Grain Dealers Mutual InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. Iowa · 1992

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API