Legal Opinion

In re Independent Service Organizations Antitrust Litigation

District Court, D. Kansas

Decided August 1, 1996No. Civil Action No. MDL-1021PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

EARL E. O’CONNOR, District Judge.

This matter is before the court on motions by defendant Xerox Corporation for sanctions (Doc. # 292) and for a protective order (Doc. #286). After brief oral argument at the July 23, 1996, status conference, and careful consideration of the parties’ briefs, the court is now prepared to rule. For the reasons set forth below, defendant’s motion for sanctions will be granted in part and the motion for a protective order will be granted.

Motion for Sanctions

Xerox alleges that the CSU plaintiffs have failed and refused to reveal information about…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Michele E. Shepherd and Larue Graves v. American Broadcasting Companies, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1995
  2. Casson Construction Co. v. Armco Steel Corp.United States District Court for the District of Arkansas · 1980
  3. Cal Dive International, Inc. v. M/V TziminDistrict Court, S.D. Alabama · 1989
  4. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. HBE Corp.District Court, E.D. Missouri · 1994

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Caesars Entertainment, Inc.District Court, D. Nevada · 2006
  2. Louisiana Pacific Corp. v. Money Market 1 Institutional Investment DealerDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2012
  3. Cache La Poudre Feeds, LLC v. Land O'Lakes, Inc.District Court, D. Colorado · 2007
  4. Starlight International Inc. v. HerlihyDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1999
  5. Sender v. MannDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2004

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API