Legal Opinion

Genung v. Commissioner of Public Safety

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided March 2, 1999No. C7-98-1553PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DAVIES, Judge.

Appellant challenges a district court order sustaining the revocation of his driver’s license under the implied consent statute, Minn.Stat. § 169.123 (1998). He contends that the urine test administered to him was inaccurate, even though he was tested in accordance with Bureau of Criminal Apprehension (BCA) procedures. We affirm.

FACTS

Appellant Jason Robert Genung was arrested for DWI on March 22, 1998. The arresting officer offered him a choice of either a blood or a urine test to measure his alcohol concentration; appellant chose the urine test. At first, appellant could…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Thiele v. StichSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
  2. State v. DilleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  3. State v. KulsethSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
  4. Brooks v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1998
  5. State v. EliCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Boatwright v. BudakCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2001
  2. State v. PearsonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2001
  3. Hayes v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2009
  4. State v. EdstromCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2010
  5. In re A.J.B.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2018

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API