Genung v. Commissioner of Public Safety
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DAVIES, Judge.
Appellant challenges a district court order sustaining the revocation of his driver’s license under the implied consent statute, Minn.Stat. § 169.123 (1998). He contends that the urine test administered to him was inaccurate, even though he was tested in accordance with Bureau of Criminal Apprehension (BCA) procedures. We affirm.
FACTS
Appellant Jason Robert Genung was arrested for DWI on March 22, 1998. The arresting officer offered him a choice of either a blood or a urine test to measure his alcohol concentration; appellant chose the urine test. At first, appellant could…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Thiele v. StichSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- State v. DilleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- State v. KulsethSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
- Brooks v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1998
- State v. EliCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
3Cited by7 opinions
- Boatwright v. BudakCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2001
- State v. PearsonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2001
- Hayes v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2009
- State v. EdstromCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2010
- In re A.J.B.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2018
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.